Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• Trump administration argues before Supreme Court to overturn birthright citizenship via executive order — The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Wednesday regarding Trump's February 2025 executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship by reinterpreting the 14th Amendment's citizenship clause. Solicitor General John Sauer argued that "domicile" (permanent residence) should be required for citizenship, excluding children born to undocumented or temporarily present parents. A majority of justices appeared skeptical of the government's position. The case challenges 125+ years of precedent established in United States v. Wong Kim Ark. A decision is expected in summer 2026.
• Trump’s Executive Order on Citizenship — On January 20, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order titled “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship,” which asserts that individuals born in the U.S. are not citizens if their parents do not have legal permanent status. This order contradicts the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of birthright citizenship.
• ACLU Represents Families Against Trump’s Order — The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is representing three families in a lawsuit against the Trump administration's executive order that seeks to end birthright citizenship. The case, Trump v. Barbara, includes an asylum applicant from Honduras whose child is due after the order's implementation.
• President Trump Attends Supreme Court Oral Arguments — On April 1, 2026, President Donald J. Trump attended oral arguments at the United States Supreme Court for the case Trump v. Barbara, which seeks to end birthright citizenship as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. This marked the first time a sitting president has attended such proceedings. The case stems from Trump's executive order issued on January 20, 2025, which declared that individuals born in the U.S. are not citizens if their parents lack legal permanent status. The ACLU represents families challenging this order.

Supporting reports

• Trump attended Supreme Court oral arguments in birthright citizenship case — President Donald J. Trump attended oral arguments at the United States Supreme Court on April 1, 2026, in Trump v. Barbara, a case challenging birthright citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment. Trump sat in the front row alongside Attorney General Pam Bondi and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. The case arose from Trump's January 20, 2025 executive order declaring that individuals born in the United States are not citizens if their parents lack legal permanent status. Three families, represented by the ACLU, sued to challenge the order. Trump departed after approximately ninety minutes, before the ACLU's oral argument began.
• Trump attended Supreme Court oral arguments on birthright citizenship case — On April 1, 2026, President Trump attended oral arguments before the Supreme Court on the birthright citizenship case, breaking precedent by sitting in the front row of public seating alongside Attorney General Pam Bondi and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. He left after an hour and a half, before the ACLU lawyer began her argument. Lower court judges had already called the executive order "blatantly unconstitutional."
• Trump Attends Supreme Court Oral Arguments — On April 1, 2026, President Donald J. Trump attended oral arguments at the Supreme Court regarding the legality of his executive order on birthright citizenship. This marked the first time a sitting president attended such proceedings, raising concerns about potential intimidation of the justices. Trump was present alongside his attorney general and commerce secretary but left before the plaintiffs' attorney began speaking.
• Supreme Court hears birthright citizenship arguments; justices skeptical of Trump position — The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship. Justice Kagan stated directly that the text of the 14th Amendment does not support Trump's position and that the administration was relying on "pretty obscure sources." Justice Kavanaugh acknowledged that other countries lack birthright citizenship but questioned its constitutional relevance. Justice Gorsuch raised the landmark precedent Wong Kim Ark in a manner unfavorable to the government's argument.
• Trump attends Supreme Court oral argument and leaves early — Trump became the first sitting president in history to attend a Supreme Court oral argument. He sat in the front row of the public gallery during the birthright citizenship case but left before the arguments concluded, apparently finding the proceedings not to his liking.
• ACLU Represents Families Against Trump’s Order — The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is representing three families in a lawsuit against the Trump administration's executive order that seeks to end birthright citizenship. The case, Trump v. Barbara, includes an asylum applicant from Honduras whose child is due after the order's implementation.
• President Trump Attends Supreme Court Oral Arguments — On April 1, 2026, President Donald J. Trump attended oral arguments at the United States Supreme Court for the case Trump v. Barbara, which seeks to end birthright citizenship as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. This marked the first time a sitting president has attended such proceedings. The case stems from Trump's executive order issued on January 20, 2025, which declared that individuals born in the U.S. are not citizens if their parents lack legal permanent status. The ACLU represents families challenging this order.
• Trump’s Historical Precedent at the Supreme Court — President Trump’s attendance at the Supreme Court oral arguments on April 1, 2026, breaks historical precedent, as no sitting president has previously attended such proceedings. His presence is seen as an attempt to influence the court's decision on a case that could significantly alter the interpretation of citizenship in the U.S.

Supporting reports

• Hundreds rally in defense of birthright citizenship at Supreme Court as Trump attends oral arguments — Approximately 250 demonstrators gathered on the steps of the US Supreme Court on Wednesday to defend birthright citizenship and the 14th Amendment as the Court heard oral arguments challenging Trump's January 2025 executive order targeting the constitutional right. Trump attended the proceedings in an unprecedented appearance. The ACLU, representing Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire chapters, argued against the executive order. A majority of justices appeared skeptical of the government's position, though the outcome remains uncertain. A final decision is expected in summer 2026.

Supporting reports

• The Save America Act: A Modern Day Poll Tax — The Democracy Docket article discusses the implications of the Save America Act, which is characterized as a modern-day poll tax. The act is critiqued for potentially restricting voting rights and access, drawing parallels to historical poll taxes that disenfranchised voters. The article emphasizes the importance of monitoring such legislative actions as they can significantly impact democratic participation and election fairness.
• Trump administration executive order restricting mail-in voting challenged in federal court — A coalition of civil rights groups filed a lawsuit in federal court in Massachusetts on Thursday challenging an executive order Trump signed on Tuesday that restricts mail-in voting. The order instructs the federal government to create a list of eligible voters in each state and directs the US Postal Service to transmit mail-in ballots only to people on that list. The plaintiffs argue the order violates the Constitution's separation of powers, Article I Section 4 (state control of elections), the Voting Rights Act, and the Privacy Act. This is Trump's second attempt to unilaterally alter voting procedures; a previous order was largely blocked by a federal judge last year.
• Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections — President Trump issued an executive order directing creation of lists of US citizens eligible to vote in each state and requiring the US Postal Service to refrain from sending mailed ballots to anyone not on those lists. The order drew immediate condemnation for apparent unconstitutionality and swift threats of legal action from voting rights advocates.
• Trump issues executive order on voter eligibility lists and mail ballot restrictions — President Trump signed an executive order directing the Department of Homeland Security and Social Security Administration to compile a national voter file and restricting mail-in ballot use. The order requires USPS to establish rule-making for a process prohibiting mail-in ballots unless voters are on a federal approval list. Election law experts and Democratic officials immediately challenged the order as unconstitutional, citing the Constitution's grant of election authority to states. Multiple lawsuits were announced within hours of signing.
• Trump signs executive order restricting mail-in ballots and directing national voter file compilation — President Trump signed an executive order attacking mail-in voting, directing the Department of Homeland Security to work with the Social Security Administration to create a federal list of verified U.S. citizens eligible to vote in each state. The order directs the U.S. Postal Service to send mail-in ballots only to voters on the list and to mark each ballot with a unique barcode. It threatens states refusing to cooperate with loss of federal funding and directs Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate anyone wrongfully distributing mail-in ballots. Election law experts and Democratic officials immediately challenged the order as unconstitutional.
• Trump signed executive order restricting mail-in voting — The White House published a fact sheet characterizing the Trump administration's policies on transgender issues as dismantling "woke" initiatives. The document claims the administration declared two immutable sexes as official policy, banned federal funding for gender-affirming medical care for minors, ended federal support for "gender ideology" curricula, enforced sex-based sports eligibility, reinstated military service standards based on biological sex, eliminated gender ideology from service academies, directed enforcement of single-sex spaces based on biological sex, ended gender self-identification on federal documents, and redirected billions in grants. The fact sheet attributes policy changes to multiple health systems and sports organizations.
• White House issued fact sheet on Trump administration policies regarding transgender-related healthcare, military service, and education — The White House published a fact sheet on March 31, 2026, describing an executive order signed by President Trump that directs the Secretary of Homeland Security and Social Security Administration to compile state citizenship lists of eligible voters, requires the Postmaster General to establish secure ballot procedures through USPS, and directs the Attorney General to investigate and prosecute election officials who issue ballots to ineligible voters and to withhold federal funds from noncompliant states. The fact sheet frames the order as strengthening election integrity and preventing non-citizen voting.
• White House issues fact sheet on executive order requiring citizenship verification for federal elections — On March 31, Trump signed an executive order directing the administration to compile lists of verified eligible voters in each state and requiring USPS to deliver mail-in ballots only to voters on state-approved absentee lists. On April 21, 37 Democratic senators warned that the order illegally transforms USPS into an election administration agency. State attorneys general filed suit on April 22, and senators introduced the Absentee and Mail Voter Protection Act to nullify the order. Election law experts called it unconstitutional.
• Trump's mail-voting executive order drew legal challenges and legislative response — On Tuesday, March 31, 2026, President Trump signed an executive order framed as an "election integrity" measure that directs the Department of Homeland Security and Social Security Administration to create a national voter list, orders the Postal Service to send mail-in ballots only to those on the list, and instructs the Attorney General to withhold federal funds from "non-compliant" states and cities. Legal experts and voting rights advocates say the order is unconstitutional and likely to be blocked by courts, as the President lacks authority over elections—a power reserved to states and Congress.
• Trump signs executive order restricting mail-in voting and directing creation of national voter list — Trump signed an executive order at 5:00 PM requiring the federal government to compile a list of US citizens eligible to vote in each state and mandating that ballots be sent only to those on each state's approved mail-in ballot list. The order threatened to withhold federal funding from states that disobey. The Postal Service was directed to monitor mail-in ballot distribution for federal elections.
• Trump signed executive order restricting mail-in voting nationwide — President Trump signed an executive order directing the Department of Homeland Security to compile and transmit state citizenship lists to election officials, requiring the Postal Service to implement unique ballot identifiers (barcodes) on mail-in ballots, and instructing the Attorney General to prioritize investigation and prosecution of election officials and others involved in issuing ballots to non-citizens. The order mandates DHS establish infrastructure within 90 days and USPS complete rulemaking within 120 days to enforce these requirements across federal elections.
• Trump issues executive order on citizenship verification and mail-in ballot tracking for federal elections — President Trump signed Executive Order 14399 on March 31, 2026, directing the Department of Homeland Security to compile and transmit to state election officials a "State Citizenship List" derived from federal citizenship, naturalization, and Social Security Administration records. The order requires the U.S. Postal Service to initiate rulemaking within 60 days mandating that all outbound ballot mail bear unique Intelligent Mail barcodes and "Official Election Mail" markings, with states required to submit lists of eligible mail-in voters to USPS at least 60 days before elections. The order directs the Attorney General to prioritize investigation and prosecution of state and local election officials and others involved in issuing ballots to ineligible individuals. The USPS must issue final rules within 120 days.
• Trump signed Executive Order 14399 directing federal citizenship verification and mail-in ballot tracking for federal elections — Trump signed an executive order on March 31 to restrict mail-in voting by creating a list of eligible US citizen voters in every state and prohibiting the US Postal Service from sending absentee ballots to voters not on state-approved lists. The order threatens to withhold federal funding from states that refuse to comply. States including Oregon and Arizona have challenged the order, arguing it violates the Constitution.
• Trump signs executive order restricting mail-in voting

Supporting reports

• Trump attacked the Supreme Court on birthright citizenship case — Trump publicly attacked the Supreme Court, calling it "stupid" and "dumb" as he attempted to pre-spin a potential and likely loss in a case on birthright citizenship. The attack on the judiciary reflects contempt for the court and an attempt to delegitimize an unfavorable ruling before it is issued.
• Trump posted criticism of Supreme Court justices ahead of birthright citizenship oral arguments — Two days before Trump administration lawyers were scheduled to argue the birthright citizenship case before SCOTUS, Trump posted on social media that the justices are "dumb," stating: "Birthright Citizenship is not about rich people from China, and the rest of the World, who want their children, FOR PAY, to ridiculously become citizens of the US. It is about the BABIES OF SLAVES! The World is laughing at how STUPID our US Court System has become (TARIFFS!). Dumb Judges and Justices will not a great Country make!"

Supporting reports

• 50501 Movement announced March 28 "No Kings" national mobilization — The 50501 Movement announced a national mobilization scheduled for March 28, 2026, titled "No Kings," framed as a response to the administration's military actions and economic policies. The movement called on supporters to "defend ourselves and our communities against this administration's unjust and cruel acts of violence" and stated: "America does not belong to strongmen, greedy billionaires, or those who rule through fear. It belongs to us, the people."
• 50501 Movement announces March 28 NO KINGS mass mobilization — The 50501 Movement, a nationwide coalition organizing peaceful democratic action across all 50 states, announced a mass mobilization scheduled for March 28, 2026. The announcement details preparatory work including permit coordination, accessibility planning, volunteer training, and safety protocols. Interim actions are scheduled for January 30 (National Shutdown), January 31 (ICE Out of Everywhere), and February 17 (Impeach, Convict, Remove, Defund). The movement is coordinating through local state groups and directing participants to NoKings.org for updates and community involvement.
• 50501 Movement coordinates nationwide protest events across all 50 states — The 50501 Movement, a grassroots organization defending democracy, announced coordination of over 3,000 planned protest events across all 50 states scheduled for March 28, 2026 (referred to as "No Kings day"). The week preceding the action included organizational messaging on logistics, historical parallels, addressing activist burnout, and media visibility strategy. The movement emphasized the need for independent documentation and distribution of event coverage to counter potential platform suppression by Meta and other corporate-controlled social media channels.
• 50501 Movement organizes nationwide peaceful action for March 28, 2026 — The 50501 Movement, a grassroots organization with nearly 100,000 readers, is coordinating peaceful democratic action across all 50 states for March 28, 2026. Local chapters in Georgia, Massachusetts, Virginia, Central Oregon, and Missouri are organizing sign-making parties, mutual aid drives, de-escalation training, food logistics, transportation coordination, and community resource hubs. The effort mirrors the organizational infrastructure built by Bayard Rustin for the 1963 March on Washington, emphasizing local preparation, accessibility, and post-event civic engagement to sustain momentum beyond the single day of action.
• 50501 Movement organizing national day of action for March 28 — The 50501 Movement, a nationwide civil-society organization with approximately 100,000 Substack readers, is coordinating a national day of action called "No Kings" scheduled for March 28, 2026. Local groups across multiple states—including Georgia, Massachusetts, Virginia, Oregon, and Missouri—are organizing preparatory activities including sign-making gatherings, safety trainings, carpools, mutual aid drives, and local organizing meetings. The effort draws on historical precedent from the 1963 March on Washington, which coordinated transportation and safety planning across the country to assemble 250,000 participants.
• March 28 No Kings protest drew 8 million participants across 3,300+ events in all 50 states and 15+ countries — On March 28, 2026, the No Kings movement organized over 3,300 protests across all 50 U.S. states and at least 15 countries, drawing approximately 8 million participants. Major events included St. Paul (100,000+), Boston (180,000), New York (350,000+), Seattle (75,000–100,000), and smaller towns including Driggs, Idaho. The vast majority of demonstrations were peaceful; Los Angeles saw dozens of arrests near a federal detention center following a dispersal order. The movement has grown from 5 million participants in June 2025 to 8 million in March 2026, representing approximately 2.4% of the U.S. population and approaching the 3.5% threshold historically associated with major political change.
• No Kings 3 mass mobilization: 8 million participants across 3,300 events in all 50 states and 15+ countries — Organizers reported over 8 million people participated in more than 3,300 No Kings events on March 28, 2026, across all 50 states and at least 15 countries. Major outlets described it as the largest single day of protest in American history, surpassing the 2017 Women's March (3.2–5.3 million). Nearly half of protests occurred in GOP strongholds; two-thirds of RSVPs came from outside major urban centers. Flagship events included St. Paul (100,000–200,000), New York City (350,000+), Boston (180,000+), and Seattle (75,000–100,000). NYPD reported zero protest-related arrests. The movement has grown from 5 million participants in June 2025 to 7 million in October to 8 million in March.
• No Kings 3 nationwide coordinated protest held across all 50 states and internationally — On March 28, 2026, the 50501 Movement organized No Kings 3, a coordinated nationwide protest with organizers estimating 8–9 million participants across more than 3,200 events in all 50 states and several countries. Roughly two-thirds of events occurred outside major cities, representing a 40% increase in smaller-community participation compared to the movement's June 2025 mobilization. Major events included 100,000+ in St. Paul (with performances by Bruce Springsteen and remarks by Bernie Sanders, Jane Fonda, Joan Baez, and Gov. Tim Walz), 50,000 in Albuquerque, 7,000 in Birmingham, and demonstrations in competitive suburban areas across Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Arizona. The White House dismissed the protests as products of "leftist funding networks" despite the president's approval rating at 36%. The vast majority of demonstrations were peaceful; arrests occurred only near ICE facilities in Los Angeles and a small number of other cities following dispersal orders.
• No Kings 3 protest planned for March 28, 2026 — The 50501 Movement announced a planned protest action titled "No Kings 3" scheduled for March 28, 2026. The movement is organizing citizens to show up and demonstrate against the administration's policies, framed as defense of democracy and opposition to violence against families and communities.
• No Kings March 28 planned demonstrations across all 50 states — Over 3,000 events are planned for Saturday, March 28, 2026, across all 50 states as part of the No Kings movement to defend democracy. Communities across the country have been building carpool systems, training de-escalation teams, organizing mutual aid drives, and planning post-event actions to sustain momentum. The article calls on participants to document and share evidence of turnout to counter potential minimization by mainstream media and social platforms.
• NO KINGS mass mobilization scheduled — The 50501 Movement announced the next NO KINGS mass mobilization scheduled for March 28. The announcement directs participants to NoKings.Org and provides a guide for local organizers ("How to Organize a Protest"), indicating a coordinated multi-state protest action.
• No Kings mobilization scheduled for March 28 in Minneapolis — The 50501 Movement announced the next NO KINGS mass mobilization scheduled for March 28, 2026. The announcement includes organizing guidance for local protest organizers and beginners, signaling a coordinated national day of protest and civil-society action.
• Over 3,000 No Kings protests planned across all 50 U.S. states for March 28, 2026 — The 50501 Movement announced a nationwide mobilization event called "No Kings" scheduled for Saturday, March 28, 2026, with a flagship event planned for Minneapolis, Minnesota. The announcement directs participants to Nokings.org for additional information and coordination details.
• Over 3,000 protest events planned across the U.S. and internationally — The 50501 Movement and a broad coalition including the ACLU, Indivisible, AFL-CIO, MoveOn, SEIU, and Planned Parenthood Action Fund have organized over 3,000 simultaneous protest events scheduled for March 28, 2026, across all 50 states. The article frames this as the third major national mobilization in less than a year, following June and October 2025 protests that drew millions of participants. The flagship event is planned for St. Paul, Minnesota, with speakers including Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan, Attorney General Keith Ellison, Joan Baez, and Jane Fonda. Organizers are calling for public participation at community-level events.
• Millions of Americans participated in "No Kings" protests across all 50 states and globally — On March 28, 2026, more than 3,000 protest events are scheduled to take place across all 50 U.S. states, Washington D.C., and a dozen countries. This marks an increase from previous events, with nearly 7 million participants attending the last round of demonstrations. The events are organized by the 50501 Movement, which aims to defend democracy through peaceful action. The gatherings are expected to foster a sense of community and collective efficacy among participants, countering feelings of isolation and activist burnout.
• "No Kings" national protest coordinated for March 28, 2026 — On March 28, 2026, millions of Americans and their allies participated in more than 3,100 "No Kings" events across all 50 states, U.S. territories, Washington, D.C., and towns and cities around the world. The protests appear to represent the largest one-day protest in American history, mobilizing citizens to defend democratic self-governance against what participants viewed as authoritarian threats.
• Over 8 million people participate in "No Kings" protests across US and abroad — Democracy Out Loud announced coordination of more than 3,000 simultaneous protests planned for March 28, 2026, across the country and internationally. The newsletter described this as the fourth such national protest event, characterized as peaceful, joyous, and massive in prior iterations. Organizers framed the action as resistance to authoritarianism and a response to what the author described as a war started by the Trump administration and state-level voter suppression efforts.
• Americans protest against historical revisionism — More than 8 million people in all 50 states and over a dozen countries participated in the third series of "No Kings" protests on March 28, opposing Trump administration executive overreach. The demonstrations included more than 3,300 rallies across the country and marked the largest number of protests in a single day in US history, according to organizers. The protests reflected widespread public opposition to perceived authoritarian governance.
• Thousands of protesters gathered globally in "No Kings" demonstrations against Trump administration policies. — On March 28, 2026, millions of Americans participated in over 3,100 “No Kings” events across all 50 states and internationally, protesting against the administration's efforts to rewrite American history and demanding the preservation of historical truths.
• Hundreds rally in defense of birthright citizenship at Supreme Court as Trump attends oral arguments — Organized by a coalition of activist groups under the "No Kings" banner, the third such countrywide protest in ten months drew an estimated 8 million participants across big cities and small towns worldwide. Demonstrators, including elected officials and community leaders, protested the war in Iran, threats to voting rights, and mass deportation policies. Major rallies included one outside the Minnesota Capitol where Bruce Springsteen performed, and marches in Washington, DC to the military base where Stephen Miller resides. The White House dismissed the protests as "Trump derangement therapy sessions."
• NDLON Adopt a Day Labor Corner ongoing campaign — Approximately 250 demonstrators gathered on the steps of the US Supreme Court on Wednesday to defend birthright citizenship and the 14th Amendment as the Court heard oral arguments challenging Trump's January 2025 executive order targeting the constitutional right. Trump attended the proceedings in an unprecedented appearance. The ACLU, representing Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire chapters, argued against the executive order. A majority of justices appeared skeptical of the government's position, though the outcome remains uncertain. A final decision is expected in summer 2026.
• Public protest at Texas state capitol against Big Bend border wall; construction plans revised in response — The National Day Laborer Organizing Network (NDLON) is conducting an ongoing "Adopt a Day Labor Corner" campaign calling for people to show up as allies, witnesses, neighbors, and friends at sites where immigrant workers gather, including Home Depots, car washes, hiring sites, and day-labor corners. The campaign frames accompaniment as deterrence and visible community presence to protect vulnerable people from intimidation and arrest.
• — In April 2026, concerned citizens organized a protest at the Texas state capitol opposing the Big Bend border wall. Following public pressure, including this protest, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency revised its construction plans on its public smart wall map. The map currently suggests surveillance technology and patrol roads in the national park rather than a full concrete wall, though residents remain skeptical of CBP's transparency and the ecological impact remains a concern.